Tulsi Gabbard – Another Strategic zionist Asset

Mohamed Ousman

Sha'ban 17, 1446 2025-02-16

Daily News Analysis

by Mohamed Ousman

For decades, Muslims have fallen for zionist tricks when they portray artificial schisms as being real.

The result has been that they bounce from one politician and/or political party to another only to be bitten time and time again.

At times they join with the Democrats and at others they swing to the Republicans.

This behavior characterizes their position worldwide where they’re with the Conservatives at one time and then they swing to Labor in the UK, or they are with Labor and then they swing to Likud in colonised Palestine incorrectly called Israel.

They swing to the Right and then they swing to the Left or from the Liberals to the Conservatives and vice versa.

Muslims hanging onto this political pendulum have been repeatedly embarrassed and back-stabbed.

Where they have supported politicians in political parties on one position, they have found themselves at odds with such politicians and political parties on numerous other issues.

The latest disaster in this string of politicians to fool the Muslims is Tulsi Gabbard, herself a former Democrat who has changed political labels, costumes and chairs.

Notwithstanding the fact that she is known in the anti-war movement and among some status quo Muslims as “one of us”, in the Islamic Movement, committed Muslims always considered her to be a strategic zionist asset, even as other Muslims were often ready to sing her praises.

Her support for Israel has remained strong over the decades and at least one prominent Rabbi has reciprocated support by looking forward to her swift appointment as the US Director of National Intelligence.

Activists in the Islamic Movement recall her withdrawal from an event at which she accepted to speak a decade ago at a conference organized by an Islamic Organization in Seattle, Washington.

A week before the conference, she inquired about the other speakers and upon learning that Imam Muhammad Al Asi was one of them, she withdrew.

This was a congress woman who was willing to meet Bashar Al Asad but never willing to meet the only elected Imam of the Mosque in Washington DC who was known for his unequivocal criticism of imperialist and zionist aggression.

Despite crafting an image of being anti-interventionist, her reputation was built on her involvement in the Army National Guard where she was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait.

She received a Combat Medical Badge in 2005 for participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III.

She self-describes herself as a hawk when it comes to terrorism, a euphemism for Islamic self-determination.

Her condemnation of the Islamic Resistance in standing up to genocidal Israel went a step further after October 7, 2023 when she took an Islamophobic snipe at Muslims resisting those who are colonizing and genociding them.

She labeled Hamas as a radical Islamist terrorist organization and their supporters as puppets.

Gabbard apparently does not support a ceasefire in Gaza despite her anti-interventionist stance.

In an interview on Fox News she called the Islamic resistance movement Hamas a “threat that needs to be defeated militarily and ideologically”.

Hamas came to power as a result of a free and fair election in 2006.

As such, they are the elected representatives of the people in Gaza.

Showing support for the Israeli genocide of the people in Gaza, she says “We have to be realists about the threat that continues to exist for the people of Israel. So as long as Hamas is in power, the people of Israel will not be secure and cannot live in peace.”

Adding to her anti-Muslim animus and love for genocidalists, of all days, she chose Valentine’s day, to welcome another Islamophobe and genocidalist.

She went on to state that it was an honor to welcome Narendra Modi back to the United States and (she) looked forward to strengthen the US-India friendship.

As she has become notorious for flip-flopping on almost all issues, it hardly came as a surprise when she even apologized for her previous “homophobic” positions.

When she was still in the camp of the Democrats, Gabbard was asked on CNN if she believed Iran posed an imminent security threat?

She replied, “the central question that needed to be asked was: “Is our country’s national security better off because of Donald Trump’s actions and decision? And the answer to that is no.”

She then accused Trump of leading the US down a path towards war with Iran that had “no justification whatsoever for this illegal and unconstitutional act of war that President Trump took”, referring to the assassination of Qassem Solaimani.

In the second Trump regime, it is revealing that on the day that Trump appointed Gabbard to the position of Director of National Intelligence, the Washington Post said Israel is likely to strike Iran in the coming months according to a warning issues by US intelligence!?

This raises questions about the source of the intelligence and more importantly her role, given her pro-Israel bias.

Will she be the zionist asset to rubber stamp that strike?

Heretofore, the only issue that Gabbard has been consistent on is her animus towards Islamic freedom fighters.

While, in her appointment speech, she did correctly admit to the routine failures of US intelligence that has resulted in disastrous wars, she failed to point to the sources of that faulty intelligence.

Now that she finds herself in Trump’s cabinet, it remains to be seen whether she will be consistent in opposing a strike on Iran or her pro-Israel bias led to her appointment as Director of National Intelligence to act on such preconceived intelligence.

Given that she went from being perceived as an “anti-war” advocate to becoming openly pro-Israel and anti-Muslim/anti-Iran on October 7, 2023, it is wiser to expect nothing but the worst.

As far as the responsibility of Muslims is concerned, are they capable of learning from their strategic blunders where they habitually place their reliance on the enemies of Allah, His Prophet and the committed Muslims for resolution of their own problems?

It is about time they take responsibility for their own future and their self-determination and break the bad habit of wanting to place their trust in people who swing with the Israeli pendulum.

“O you who are committed to Allah [His power and authority]! Do not [politically and militarily] affiliate yourselves with My enemy and your enemy, bidding them mutual affection even though they have in fact rejected the truth and justice revealed to you, which they [demonstrated by] expelling the Apostle [from Makkah] along with [expelling] you, only because you committed yourselves to your Sustainer! [You should follow My instructions] if you are out there exerting your utmost on a [lifelong] course leading to Me, and if you are seeking My courteous approval. [Some of] you show them [My enemies] fondness covertly: but [you should realize that] I know very well what you have concealed [from the public] and what you have made public. And whoever does such [enters into an alliance with them] has already seriously gone off course” (The Ascendant Qur’an, Surat Al Mumtahanah, verse 1).