US wants Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas And Ansarallah To Disarm To Protect Israel

Empowering Weak & Oppressed

Ayman Ahmed

Rabi' al-Awwal 08, 1447 2025-09-01

News & Analysis

by Ayman Ahmed (News & Analysis, Crescent International Vol. 55, No. 7, Rabi' al-Awwal, 1447)

Unable to defeat them militarily, the zionist entity has blackmailed Donald Trump to demand that Islamic Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas and Ansarallah disarm. Various arguments, all of them illegal and illogical, are used to achieve the same goal: zionist Israel should remain the undiputed power with no rivals in the region.

In Iran’s case, the argument advanced is that it should not have nuclear weapons. It has no plans to do so. Even US intelligence agencies have repeatedly confirmed this despite the zionist war criminals repeating this allegation since 1996. If Iran had wanted the bomb, surely it would have acquired one in nearly 30 years.

The other equally absurd demand made of Tehran is that it should abandon its billistic missile program. Why? Let us understand what this means: Iran should have no defence capabilities. What country would agree to such an absurd demand?

Iran has not attacked any country in more than 250 years; the zionist war criminals and the American warlords have repeatedly attacked other countries throughout their existence. The Islamic Republic has defended itself against foreign aggression, a fundamental right of every country.

So, on what basis is this demand being made of Iran? The bottom line is that the zionist entity should have a free hand to attack any country or group in its expansionist drive to establish the ‘Greater Israel’ project. It cannot be allowed to materialize regardless of whatever the devilish minds of Trump or Netanyahu conjure up.

The demand against resistance groups is equally dangerous and emanates from the same mindset. In Hizbullah’s case, it is argued that a non-state actor should not have any weapons; that it must hand over its weapons to the Lebanese army.

Is the Lebanese army capable of defending Lebanon’s territory or sovereignty? Israeli war planes and drones violate Lebanese airspace on a daily basis. The zionists also attack Lebanese villages in the south. Where is the Lebanese army and why does it not confront the zionist war criminals to defend its villages and airspace?

The only force that has done so is Hizbullah. Their fighters have offered immense sacrifices to defend all the people of Lebanon. Resistance movement leaders have been martyred while confronting the zionist war criminals.

The zionist entity continues to occupy Sheba Farms as well as several hilltops in South Lebanon despite the November 27, 2024 agreement between the zionist entity and the Lebanese government. Why is the government in Beirut silent about repeated Israeli violations of this agreement? Why is the Lebanese army not engaging the zionist occupiers to push them out of Lebanese territory?

The simple answer is that it is incapable of doing so. The decision announced by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s government to strip the Resistance of its weapons was made following pressure by US envoy Tom Barrack. He met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in July and made this demand. The American envoy met the Lebanese president again on August 18 to pressure him to continue with the plan to disarm Hizbullah.

Barrack was back in Beirut with other US officials and senators on August 26. His entourage met Lebanon’s president in the Baabda palace and again demanded Hiszbullah’s disarmament. At a press conference after the meeting,Barrack resorted to imperialistic language calling questions by Lebanese journalists “animalistic”. This caused an outrage in Lebanon.

The following day when he wanted to visit to Tyre and Khiam in South Lebanon, he had to cut the visit short due to protests by villagers. Khiam is the former Israeli concentration camp from where the zionists were driven out by Hizbullah resistance. Lebanese villagers were outraged at his demand for Hizbullah’s disarmament and his insulting comments about journalists.

Lebanon has been rendered dysfunctional under US-zionist intrigue. Aoun is a US-zionist puppet and acts on their agenda against the vital interests of Lebanon.

Not surprisingly, the Islamic Resistance has rejected the demand to disarm condemning it as a “grave sin” that undermines the country’s sovereignty and emboldens US-Israeli aggression.

Hizbullah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem warned that the decision would weaken Lebanon’s position in the face of ongoing Israeli-US hostilities and “grants Israel through political means what it failed to achieve militarily.” It was a reference to both the most recent fighting (October-November 2024) and to past confrontations where the Resistance forced the occupiers to flee (May 2000 and July-August 2006) from Lebanese territory through decisive resistance action.

Sheikh Qassem announced that it would overlook the cabinet decision about its disarmament. On August 15, while speaking at Arba‘een ceremonies, he was even more emphatic: “the Resistance will not give up its weapons”. He called the cabinet decision “dangerous”. Its political ally, Amal urged the cabinet to adopt a “corrective approach”.

Similar demands have been made of Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Palestine. The Arabian regimes—Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE—have all joined the chorus of anti-Islamic forces. The disgraceful surrender of these regimes to the zionist entity whether under the figleaf of peace treaties, or the even more scandalous label of ‘Abraham Accords’, merely confirms their subservience nature.

Neither the zionist war criminals nor the Arabian regimes have anything to do with the noble Prophet Ibrahim (as). It is a disgrace that they would use his name, a Prophet who stood up to tyranny, for their agenda of surrender. Prophet Ibrahim (as) was prepared to sacrifice his life in challenging tyranny. He was saved through a miracle of Allah.

The true inheritors of Prophet Ibrahim’s legacy are the Palestinians facing the fire of the modern-day Nimrod. They are being burned alive, blown to peaces and being starved to death but they refuse to surrender. For almost two years, the zionist war criminals have thrown all their fire power, including missiles, drones, and 2,000 lb bombs but the Palestinians refused to give up their fundamental rights.

What the zionists could not achieve through military means, they are now trying to achieve through political and diplomatic pressure. Far from helping the Palestinians, the Arabian regimes are acting treacherously because they were created for this purpose.

In 1948, Israel’s first prime minister David Ben Gurion, an illegal squatter from Poland, had said that the Arab regimes are Israel’s “first line of defence”. Today, they have become its only line of defence, thanks to the valiant struggle of the Resistance front.

For how long? Despite lacking in material and technological resources, the Resistance front has delivered massive blows to the zionists war criminals. The illegitimate zionist entity’s economy is on the verge of collapse. People are fleeing to Europe and elsewhere because they see no future in the squatter colony for themselves or their children.

A major role in this is being played by Ansarallah, the intrepid Yemeni fighters who have delivered massive blows to the entity. The Ansarallah have already driven the US navy out of the Red Sea and its aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea have moved far away from the range of Yemeni missiles and drones.

Ansarallah’s hypersonic missiles continue to rain down on the colonial entity sending the illegal squatters to their underground bunkers. It is certainly no fun living under constant fear.

The port of Eilat has been shut down because no ships can dock there following successful attacks by Ansarallah on ships carrying goods to the zionist entity. Ben Gurion airport is another of their favourite targets. Air traffic is frequently disrupted and foreign airlines have been forced to cancel flights suffering huge losses.

Demand by the US-zionist duo for members of the Resistance front to disarm is a desperate attempt to save the zionist entity from its inevitable demise.