Trump’s Message from Quebec to Singapore

What the grand strategy is… and what it ought to be
Empowering Weak & Oppressed

Eric Walberg

Shawwal 17, 1439 2018-07-01

Main Stories

by Eric Walberg (Main Stories, Crescent International Vol. 47, No. 5, Shawwal, 1439)

How to explain the welter of contradictions in US politics these days?

• Trump’s enthusiasm for peace with Russia versus his acceptance of Cold War II with Russia, launched even as Trump declared victory in 2016.

• Trump’s virtual declaration of war against the mouse, Can-ada, next door, with his cutting insult to Justin Trudeau as weak and dishonest, as he left the summit early and refused to endorse its free-trade plea.

• Trump’s original enthusiasm for pulling out of Syria and elsewhere, pursuing an old fashion Republican isolationism, versus his sudden flurry of bombings in Syria recently and the threat of invasion of others (Iran, North Korea, Venezuela).

• Trump’s dumping of the carefully crafted nuclear agreement with Iran, renewing sanctions and threats in the face of world opposition, both domestic (ok, the Zionists are happy, but no one else) and foreign.

• Trump’s unsolicited “deal of the century” with Israel-Palestine.

There are behind-the-scenes forces at work, with Russia at the centre. Obama’s and the Western media’s human rights spat with Russia over Ukraine and Crimea are not important to the long-term strategy of the neocons. Trump and his deep state backers understand this. Kis-singer admitted it in June. They want Russia back in a new G-8, as Trump so loudly proclaimed at the G-7 in Quebec in June. But a Russia on the defensive is also in their interests, the better to make Russia bow more respectfully to US world hegemony in any grand compromise. Good cop, bad cop.

Trudeau was comforted by his Euro colleagues when called a liar by the bully, but Trump has no time for wimps (Trudeau is indeed weak and dishonest, as Trump’s advisers told him after perusing his many broken promises as prime minister), pious words attacking Russia, or promoting gender equality and the environment. The “grand strategy” of the Pentagon and neocons is about world control. “His message from Quebec to Singapore is that he is going to meld the industrial democracies to his will — and bring back Russia,” said Steve Bannon, Trump’s former campaign and White House adviser. Bannon said China is “now on notice that Trump will not back down from even allies’ complaints in his goal of America First.” What Europeans deride now as “G-6 plus one” would become again the G-8. Russia will dump Iran and China, and be a nice US puppet.

There is a reason that neoconservatives are said to be the heirs of Trotsky: Trotsky wanted to export revolution to all countries, whether they were ready for it or not (with the subsequent goal of destroying national boundaries and traditional cultures); Trump’s neoconservatives want to spread neocon ideology (for example, globalism, the dominance of Western corporations and markets, ‘democracy’, relativising traditional society) to all countries. The dialectic has come full-circle.

In a weird sort of way, the (Christian) US is the anti-Christ to the (atheist) Soviet Christ. Both are/ were radical universalists. Putin understands this very well and is unlikely to take the neocon bait, as did Gorbachev-Yeltsin. Neither is Kim Jong un.

Trump enthusiast Leon Haider praises Trump’s rejection of a “make-believe peace pro-cess,” replacing it with his “deal of the century,” that counts on moderate Arabians convincing the Palestinians to “take the route toward coexistence” with Israel that “eventually leads to a peace deal, the deal of the century.” Bully the Palestinians into a deal they can’t refuse. Trump somehow thinks this bullying will succeed where all of his predecessors have failed.

But the so-called moderate Arabians are anything but:

• Saudi Arabia is a feudal fiefdom, the source and inspiration of al-Qaeda/ISIS through Wahhabism and petrodollars, provided discretly both officially and unofficially (by dissident princes). Its list of human rights violations grows daily, presently torturing its old rival Yemen for no apparent reason.

• Egypt is being run into the ground by a vicious dictator-general,

• Turkey, the most important actor, is ignored and isolated over the Kurdish problem,

• Jordan is in upheaval protesting IMF-backed price increases and a new tax reform law.

These countries are hardly poster children for the advantage of being a friend to the US and Israel. The other Arab country, Syria, just barely survived the US-backed insurgency and is back in the anti-imperialist fold (that is, pro-Iran/Russia) after seven brutal years when it was betrayed by “moderate Arabs” (not to mention Turkey). Syria, as a “moderate Arab” will continue to oppose the US “grand stategy” for the region, along with a chastened Turkey.

US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, right, exchange laughs at the G7 summit in Quebec. Parting company, however, was not sweet sorrow. Just hours after leaving the summit on 6-9-2018, President Trump abruptly retracted US support for a joint statement signed by every nation in the group and blasted Trudeau. Firing off tweets aboard Air Force One, Trump said he was reversing the US position in response to Trudeau’s comments at a press conference at the end of the summit, “PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so meek and mild during our @G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, ‘US Tariffs were kind of insulting’ and he ‘will not be pushed around.’ Very dishonest & weak.”

Where is the grand strategy here? Bin Salman personally delivered Tump’s secret “deal of the century” to Abbas, who refused to even open the envelope. For Trump’s “moderate Arabs,” read: Shi‘i-hating Sunnis, led by King Bin Salman. Their hatred is mostly sour grapes for Iran’s proud defiance of US dictates. Arabs were traditionally the freest of peoples, the heirs of the Prophet (pbuh), who was no friend of Rome. Those Sunnis would dump the US in a flash if they didn’t need Bin Salman’s billion-dollar bribes, and if there was another patron to feed them. Do they help the US achieve world control, the underlying strategy?

Only Israel is more or less happy. It is their “grand strategy” for the Palestinians that is closer. Its goal appears to be to annex the colonized territories unilaterally, set up a quisling Palestinian Authority to police what’s left of the West Bank, under Israeli control. A variation would be to force Palestinians and Jordan to make the colonized territories Jordanian (but policed by Israel) and make all Palestinians “Jordanians,” after first taking most of the desirable bits for Israel. If the Israeli Arabs cause too much fuss, they too can go to their new “homeland” (Jordan West Bank), along with Gazans, once Gaza is declared uninhabitable. Postmodern ethnic cleansing. Not so many deaths, wipe out the refugee problem at a stroke, dispense with the pesky “return” problem.

That would leave Iran or Iran/Syria as the target of Israel’s next and final war, not the Palestinians — and the Sunni Arabian world will watch from the sidelines, and would not be unhappy to see Iran destroyed. That would allow Israel to proceed with its “final solution” for the Palestinians, once Iran is out of the picture, even as these “moderate Arabs” squawk (or are overthrown).

Trump’s summit with Kim Jong un in Singapore looks and tastes like Nixon in China, but was it a fraud, the icing laced with artificial sweetener or maybe arsenic? Surely Kim realizes that he must hold out for the closure of US bases in South Korea, as only that could possibly guarantee denuclearization of the peninsula. And why no mention of Iran in all the hype, let alone a stopover in Tehran, if denuclearization is the real issue?

This image, which has gone viral, demonstrates what Trump set out
to achieve: they should all pander to him. It shows him firm and
unwilling to budge, even with allies. It’s how he wants to be seen:
America against the world (except for Israel, of course).

It appears that by allowing the interventions in Yugoslavia, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. (responsibility to protect), the so-called international community did only one thing: it created more possibilities for new interventions, interventions that promote Western control, that is, imperialism. Russia will have no truck with this, as it is not interested in promoting Western imperialism. Libya was the last straw, and instead, Russia moved on its own to help stabilize Syria without these dubious “protectors.” The disasters these interventions have resulted in means it is unlikely they can be repeated, despite Pence’s warning to Kim that he might end up “like Libya.” Probably Iran is safe, given Russia.

A real strategy would involve making peace with Iran, not war. War is the way imperialism deals with problems, and is what US “allies” Saudi Arabia and Israel want for their own reasons, which have nothing to do with peace or US security. Both the Saudis and Israel benefit(ed) from terrorism directed at US targets and celebrate them (to the Saudis, the Americans are kafirs and deserve to die. Remember Sharon’s comment on 9/11 “It’s very good”).

Peace with Iran would knock some sense into both the Saudis and Israel, and would curb the lust for war. The Saudis would fume, maybe instigate some terrorism themselves, but they are so tightly knit into the US orbit, this could be managed. Israel has its Jerusalem but nowhere to turn to. Israel’s life blood — Jewish Americans — is increasingly hostile to Israel, given its murderous policy of expansion.

The fallout from such a truly “grand strategy” would benefit both the US and the world, as the US and Russia revive their “grand compromises” of the past (WWII, 1960s– 1970s detente). A “grand compromise” for Turkey’s, Iraq’s and Iran’s Kurds could finally be addressed. Devastated Syria and Iraq would not be distracted by US-to-Iran hostility and would rebound quickly. Iran’s only objective internationally is to help the Palestinians, though the US did leave a vacuum in Iraq with the destruction of that state, and Iran is now playing its logical role as supporter of Shi‘is next door and as a good neighbour.

“Don’t hold your breath,” writes Stephen Walsh in Foreign Policy. Making peace with Iran would require Trump (and Congress) to ignore the lobbying and propaganda emanating from the Israeli and Saudi lobbies. But after the recent Israel massacre of Gazans, and given the ordinary Americans’ distaste for the Saudis and their massacre of Yemenis, there is no better time.

Congress is not lying down. The sole Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, put together a nonpartisan amendment of the National Defense Authorization Act to specifically prevent the president from launching war against Iran without congressional authorization. Even if the Ellison amendment survives the Senate, Trump could “pull a Trump” and violate it. He could target Iranian individuals as “suspected terrorists” on his global battlefield and/or attack them in Iran with military force under his new targeted killing rules. It does not prohibit the expenditure of money to attack Iran. Nor does it proscribe the use of sanctions against Iran. But it shows that Trump does not have a blank check for his “grand strategies.”

Nor are the “good” Jews in the US, energized by Israeli atrocities, silent anymore. A groundswell of Jewish protests is making room for the rest of Americans to brave the Zionist thought police.

It is complicated piecing Trump’s grand strategy together, partly be-cause he is a loose cannon, with his own self-aggrandizing agenda, and partly because of the chaotic conditions and opposing forces elsewhere. He is gambling on using good-cop/ bad-cop with Russia, plain old bad-cop with Iran and North Korea, to achieve his ends. Gunboat diplomacy.

The US (and more so Trump’s) unreliability as a representative of US policy, willing to tear up treaties, makes it unlikely that Trump’s fish will bite. Israel’s strategy is also unlikely to prevail. Young US Jews (IfNotNow is the latest, composed of Jewish teens) are already getting arrested protesting Israeli actions, much like they did in the 1950s– 1960s when they virtually led in the civil rights movement for African Americans, and again in the 1980s, when they backed the anti-apartheid struggle. Then, their Jewishness was downplayed, but in this last war, they hold the trump card to successfully fight Israel, and must speak out for peace.

Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Copyrights © 1436 AH
Sign In
Forgot Password?
Not a Member? Signup